![]() The PV is a bit cleaner, a little more raw sounding, and has a very well programmed velocity curve with 12 layers. I had a chance to compare the PV C7 to Acousticsamples C7 for reference and can give my thoughts. I'm sure the PV Steinway will have super-dry mic options, if that's your thing. Better (in my experience) to start with a dry acoustic, if your game is to add exactly the kind of verb you want after the fact. Looks like the PV Steinway, like the HZP, will have some more remote microphone placements, which can make possible incredibly realistic verb, albeit very prescribed verb, because it's hard to add verb to an inherently verby sample. The PV Yamaha, in contrast, is very, quiet: but, again, maybe that's achieved at a price, too. The price paid for that kind of high frequency authenticity, however, is a pretty noisy, dirty-sounding sample. No more lacking in the high frequencies than any other high end sample, mind you, perhaps with the exception of the HZP, which has only 4 usable layers, but which definitely has the "air" (highest frequency tone/sound characteristics) that make some recordings made with it very comparable to many modern solo classical Steinway D (Hamburg) recordings, in certain limited classical rep., that is. If I had a criticism of the Yammy, it would be that that sample lacked a bit of "air" at the very, very highest frequencies. ![]() It's a Yamaha, however so not a sample I would (myself) use for classical material-which is what I do. #Aria maestosa add pause delay before playing full version#I have the full version Yamaha, which is very, very low noise "realistic" tone (from my subjective standpoint) many layers (forget exactly how many). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |